|
1. Electronic versus print communication
Here's
an issue you wouldn't expect to see discussed in an electronic
newsletter without being sure that electronic would come out on
top. But this is a topic M Power is often asked to consult on and
an area that interests us tremendously. M Power produces two
newsletters for itself - one of each - so clearly we believe both
types have their place. Following is a brief appraisal of
electronic versus printed communication.
Electronic - 'pro's
It's spectacularly cheaper than print to produce and distribute.
It's quicker to produce.
It's environmentally preferable.
Electronic - 'con's
It doesn't easily capture people's imagination.
It has to compete with lots of other email.
It is not as credible as the printed word.
Print 'pro's
It looks great (when professionally produced).
It creates an impression - we call it 'the land'.
You can read it in bed, at the traffic lights.....
Print 'con's
Expensive to produce.
Expensive to distribute.
Once,
marketers had to compete with other advertising messages to 'cut
through' the clutter and have their ads seen and heard. In an era
of information-overload, the challenge is to cut through other
organisation's newletters and promotional materials and add value to
your target reader.
We
think electronic newsletters have their place if they deliver short,
punchy information but nothing competes with the impact of well
designed, professionally written and appropriately distributed
(it's important they go to the right people) printed newsletters when
you have a story to tell or hope that people will take the time to read
what you have written.
The
parallels with advertising are strong. Is what you have to
communicate better suited to a 30 second electronic message or a double
page spread in a magazine or newspaper?
Whichever
way you go, it's important to keep communicating with the people you
wish to understand your organisation. Communication empowers.
|